### 1 It’s Easier to Imagine the End of the World Than the End of Capitalism Added on [[2025-01-24|2025-01-24 14:43]]: > Watching Children of Men, we are inevitably reminded of the phrase attributed to Fredric Jameson and Slavoj Žižek, that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism. That slogan captures precisely what I mean by ‘capitalist realism’: the widespread sense that not only is capitalism the only viable political and economic system, but also that it is now impossible even to imagine a coherent alternative to it. ^2025-01-24-000001 --- Added on [[2025-01-26|2025-01-26 12:27]]: > I want to argue this anxiety cries out to be read in cultural terms, and the question the film poses is: how long can a culture persist without the new? What happens if the young are no longer capable of producing surprises? > > Children of Men connects with the suspicion that the end has already come, the thought that it could well be the case that the future harbors only reiteration and re-permutation. ^2025-01-26-000001 --- Added on [[2025-01-26|2025-01-26 12:29]]: > Perhaps it is possible to see the concerns of another Eliot – the Eliot of ‘Tradition and the Individual Talent’ – ciphered in Children of Men. It was in this essay that Eliot, in anticipation of Harold Bloom, described the reciprocal relationship between the canonical and the new. Eliot’s claim was that the exhaustion of the future does not even leave us with the past. Tradition counts for nothing when it is no longer contested and modified. A culture that is merely preserved is no culture at all. ^2025-01-26-000002 --- Added on [[2025-01-26|2025-01-26 12:33]]: > one effect of its ‘system of equivalence’ which can assign all cultural objects, whether they are religious iconography, pornography, or Das Kapital, a monetary value. Walk around the British Museum, where you see objects torn from their lifeworlds and assembled as if on the deck of some Predator spacecraft, and you have a powerful image of this process at work. ^2025-01-26-000003 --- Added on [[2025-01-26|2025-01-26 12:40]]: > We find ourselves at the notorious ‘end of history’ trumpeted by Francis Fukuyama after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Fukuyama’s thesis that history has climaxed with liberal capitalism may have been widely derided, but it is accepted, even assumed, at the level of the cultural unconscious. ^2025-01-26-000004 --- Added on [[2025-01-26|2025-01-26 12:42]]: > What I’m calling capitalist realism can be subsumed under the rubric of postmodernism as theorized by Jameson. Yet, despite Jameson’s heroic work of clarification, postmodernism remains a hugely contested term, its meanings, appropriately but unhelpfully, unsettled and multiple. ^2025-01-26-000005 --- Added on [[2025-01-26|2025-01-26 12:46]]: > In the 1960s and 1970s, capitalism had to face the problem of how to contain and absorb energies from outside. It now, in fact, has the opposite problem; having all-too successfully incorporated externality, how can it function without an outside it can colonize and appropriate? For most people under twenty in Europe and North America, the lack of alternatives to capitalism is no longer even an issue. ^2025-01-26-000006 --- Added on [[2025-01-26|2025-01-26 12:47]]: > ‘Alternative’ and ‘independent’ don’t designate something outside mainstream culture; rather, they are styles, in fact the dominant styles, within the mainstream. No-one embodied (and struggled with) this deadlock more than Kurt Cobain and Nirvana. In his dreadful lassitude and objectless rage, Cobain seemed to give wearied voice to the despondency of the generation that had come after history, whose every move was anticipated, tracked, bought and sold before it had even happened. ^2025-01-26-000007 --- Added on [[2025-01-26|2025-01-26 17:30]]: > The affinity between hip hop and gangster movies such as Scarface, The Godfather films, Reservoir Dogs, Goodfellas and Pulp Fiction arises from their common claim to have stripped the world of sentimental illusions and seen it for ‘what it really is’: a Hobbesian war of all against all, a system of perpetual exploitation and generalized criminality. ^2025-01-26-000008 --- ### 2 What If You Held a Protest and Everyone Came? Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:02]]: > After all, and as Žižek has provocatively pointed out, anti-capitalism is widely disseminated in capitalism. Time after time, the villain in Hollywood films will turn out to be the ‘evil corporation’. Far from undermining capitalist realism, this gestural anti-capitalism actually reinforces it. exemplifies what Robert Pfaller has called ‘interpassivity’: the film performs our anti-capitalism for us, allowing us to continue to consume with impunity. ^2025-01-28-000001 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:05]]: > Capitalist ideology in general, Žižek maintains, consists precisely in the overvaluing of belief – in the sense of inner subjective attitude – at the expense of the beliefs we exhibit and externalize in our behavior. So long as we believe (in our hearts) that capitalism is bad, we are free to ^2025-01-28-000002 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:07]]: > To reclaim a real political agency means first of all accepting our insertion at the level of desire in the remorseless meat-grinder of Capital. ^2025-01-28-000003 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:10]]: > Capitalist realism ^2025-01-28-000004 *Note: tags: c1* --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:21]]: > Environmental catastrophe is one such Real. ... But Green issues are already a contested zone, already a site where politicization is being fought for. In what follows, I want to stress two other aporias in capitalist realism, which are not yet politicized to anything like the same degree. The first is mental health. ... The other phenomenon I want to highlight is bureaucracy. ^2025-01-28-000010 --- Added on [[2025-01-30|2025-01-30 20:58]]: > Inevitably, ... work becomes geared towards the generation and massaging of representations rather than to the official goals of the work itself. ... This reversal of priorities is one of the hallmarks of a system which can be characterized without hyperbole as ‘market Stalinism’. What late capitalism repeats from Stalinism is just this valuing of symbols of achievement over actual achievement. ^2025-01-30-000006 --- Added on [[2025-02-01|2025-02-01 03:23]]: > Capitalism is what is left when beliefs have collapsed at the level of ritual or symbolic elaboration, and all that is left is the consumer-spectator, trudging through the ruins and the relics. ^2025-02-01-000001 --- Added on [[2025-02-01|2025-02-01 03:23]]: > The ‘mental health plague’ in capitalist societies would suggest that, instead of being the only social system that works, capitalism is inherently dysfunctional, and that the cost of it appearing to work is very high. ^2025-02-01-000002 --- Added on [[2025-02-01|2025-02-01 03:23]]: > The power of capitalist realism derives in part from the way that capitalism subsumes and consumes all of previous history: one effect of its ‘system of equivalence’ which can assign all cultural objects, whether they are religious iconography, pornography, or Das Kapital, a monetary value. ^2025-02-01-000003 --- Added on [[2025-02-01|2025-02-01 03:23]]: > The fantasy being that western consumerism, far from being intrinsically implicated in systemic global inequalities, could itself solve them. All we have to do is buy the right products. ^2025-02-01-000004 --- Added on [[2025-02-01|2025-02-01 03:23]]: > A film like Wall-E exemplifies what Robert Pfaller has called ‘interpassivity’: the film performs our anti-capitalism for us, allowing us to continue to consume with impunity. ^2025-02-01-000005 --- Added on [[2025-02-01|2025-02-01 03:23]]: > So long as we believe (in our hearts) that capitalism is bad, we are free to continue to participate in capitalist exchange. ^2025-02-01-000006 --- Added on [[2025-02-01|2025-02-01 03:23]]: > The way value is generated on the stock exchange depends of course less on what a company ‘really does’, and more on perceptions of, and beliefs about, its (future) performance. In capitalism, that is to say, all that is solid melts into PR, and late capitalism is defined at least as much by this ubiquitous tendency towards PR-production as it is by the imposition of market mechanisms. ^2025-02-01-000007 --- Added on [[2025-02-01|2025-02-01 03:23]]: > Capital is an abstract parasite, an insatiable vampire and zombie-maker; but the living flesh it converts into dead labor is ours, and the zombies it makes are us. ^2025-02-01-000008 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > Capitalist realism as I understand it cannot be confined to art or to the quasi-propagandistic way in which advertising functions. It is more like a pervasive atmosphere, conditioning not only the production of culture but also the regulation of work and education, and acting as a kind of invisible barrier constraining thought and action. ^2025-05-27-000001 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > ‘Flexibility’, ‘nomadism’ and ‘spontaneity’ are the very hallmarks of management in a post-Fordist, Control society. But the problem is that any opposition to flexibility and decentralization risks being self-defeating, since calls for inflexibility and centralization are, to say the least, not likely to be very galvanizing. ^2025-05-27-000002 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > The consequence is, Marazzi argues, that post-Fordist workers are like the Old Testament Jews after they left the ‘house of slavery’: liberated from a bondage to which they have no wish to return but also abandoned, stranded in the desert, confused about the way forward. ^2025-05-27-000003 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > What we are dealing with now is not the incorporation of materials that previously seemed to possess subversive potentials, but instead, their precorporation: the pre-emptive formatting and shaping of desires, aspirations and hopes by capitalist culture. ^2025-05-27-000004 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > Against the postmodernist suspicion of grand narratives, we need to reassert that, far from being isolated, contingent problems, these are all the effects of a single systemic cause: Capital. We need to begin, as if for the first time, to develop strategies against a Capital which presents itself as ontologically, as well as geographically, ubiquitous. ^2025-05-27-000005 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > With its ceaseless boom and bust cycles, capitalism is itself fundamentally and irreducibly bi-polar, periodically lurching between hyped-up mania (the irrational exuberance of ‘bubble thinking’) and depressive come-down. (The term ‘economic depression’ is no accident, of course). ^2025-05-27-000006 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > Education as a lifelong process... Training that persists for as long as your working life continues... Work you take home with you… Working from home, homing from work. A consequence of this ‘indefinite’ mode of power is that external surveillance is succeeded by internal policing. Control only works if you are complicit with it. ^2025-05-27-000007 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > What late capitalism repeats from Stalinism is just this valuing of symbols of achievement over actual achievement. ^2025-05-27-000008 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > The significance of Green critiques is that they suggest that, far from being the only viable political-economic system, capitalism is in fact primed to destroy the entire human environment. The relationship between capitalism and eco-disaster is neither coincidental nor accidental: capital’s ‘need of a constantly expanding market’, its ‘growth fetish’, mean that capitalism is by its very nature opposed to any notion of sustainability. ^2025-05-27-000009 --- Added on [[2025-05-27|2025-05-27 04:17]]: > It is important to contest capitalism’s appropriation of ‘the new’, but to reclaim the ‘new’ can’t be a matter of adapting to the conditions in which we find ourselves –we’ve done that rather too well, and ‘successful adaptation’ is the strategy of managerialism par excellence. ^2025-05-27-000010 --- Added on [[2025-08-01|2025-08-01 04:08]]: > They know things are bad, but more than that, they know they can’t do anything about it. But that ‘knowledge’, that reflexivity, is not a passive observation of an already existing state of affairs. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy. ^2025-08-01-000001 --- Added on [[2025-08-01|2025-08-01 04:08]]: > This strategy – of accepting the incommensurable and the senseless without question – has always been the exemplary technique of sanity as such, but it has a special role to play in late capitalism, that ‘motley painting of everything that ever was’, whose dreaming up and junking of social fictions is nearly as rapid as its production and disposal of commodities. ^2025-08-01-000002 --- Added on [[2025-08-01|2025-08-01 04:08]]: > The Selfish Capitalist toxins that are most poisonous to well-being are the systematic encouragement of the ideas that material affluence is they key to fulfillment, that only the affluent are winners and that access to the top is open to anyone willing to work hard enough, regardless of their familial, ethnic or social background – if you do not succeed, there is only one person to blame. ^2025-08-01-000003 --- Added on [[2025-08-01|2025-08-01 04:08]]: > Taken together, the immobilizers, with their implicit concession that capitalism can only be resisted, never overcome, and the liberal communists, who maintain that the amoral excesses of capitalism must be offset by charity, give a sense of the way in which capitalist realism circumscribes current political possibilities. ^2025-08-01-000004 --- Added on [[2025-08-01|2025-08-01 04:08]]: > Tradition counts for nothing when it is no longer contested and modified. A culture that is merely preserved is no culture at all. ^2025-08-01-000005 --- Added on [[2025-08-01|2025-08-01 04:08]]: > The old disciplinary segmentation of time is breaking down. The carceral regime of discipline is being eroded by the technologies of control, with their systems of perpetual consumption and continuous development. ^2025-08-01-000006 --- Added on [[2025-08-01|2025-08-01 04:08]]: > Foucault famously observes there that there is no need for the place of surveillance to actually be occupied. The effect of not knowing whether you will be observed or not produces an introjection of the surveillance apparatus. You constantly act as if you are always about to be observed. ^2025-08-01-000007 --- Added on [[2025-08-01|2025-08-01 04:08]]: > This pathologization already forecloses any possibility of politicization. By privatizing these problems – treating them as if they were caused only by chemical imbalances in the individual’s neurology and/or by their family background – any question of social systemic causation is ruled out. ^2025-08-01-000008 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > Considering mental illness an individual chemico-biological problem has enormous benefits for capitalism. First, it reinforces Capital’s drive towards atomistic individualization (you are sick because of your brain chemistry). Second, it provides an enormously lucrative market in which multinational pharmaceutical companies can peddle their pharmaceuticals (we can cure you with our SSRIs). ^2025-12-24-000001 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > Does anyone really think, for instance, that things would improve if we replaced the whole managerial and banking class with a whole new set of (‘better’) people? Surely, on the contrary, it is evident that the vices are engendered by the structure, and that while the structure remains, the vices will reproduce themselves. ^2025-12-24-000002 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > In the end, it was precisely hip hop’s performance of this first version of the real – ‘the uncompromising’ – that enabled its easy absorption into the second, the reality of late capitalist economic instability, where such authenticity has proven highly marketable. ^2025-12-24-000003 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > ‘Being realistic’ may once have meant coming to terms with of a reality experienced as solid and immovable. Capitalist realism, however, entails subordinating oneself to a reality that is infinitely plastic, capable of reconfiguring itself at any moment. ^2025-12-24-000004 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > That slogan captures precisely what I mean by ‘capitalist realism’: the widespread sense that not only is capitalism the only viable political and economic system, but also that it is now impossible even to imagine a coherent alternative to it. ^2025-12-24-000005 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > Action is pointless; only senseless hope makes sense. Superstition and religion, the first resorts of the helpless, proliferate. ^2025-12-24-000006 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > In conditions where realities and identities are upgraded like software, it is not surprising that memory disorders should have become the focus of cultural anxiety – see, for instance, the Bourne films, Memento, Eternal Sunshine Of the Spotless Mind. ^2025-12-24-000007 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > The idea that the world we experience is a solipsistic delusion projected from the interior of our mind consoles rather than disturbs us, since it conforms with our infantile fantasies of omnipotence; but the thought that our so-called interiority owe its existence to a fictionalized consensus will always carry an uncanny charge. ^2025-12-24-000008 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > The use of headphones is significant here – pop is experienced not as something which could have impacts upon public space, but as a retreat into private ‘OedIpod’ consumer bliss, a walling up against the social. ^2025-12-24-000009 --- Added on [[2025-12-24|2025-12-24 04:20]]: > As Harvey shows, neoliberals were more Leninist than the Leninists, using think-tanks as the intellectual vanguard to create the ideological climate in which capitalist realism could flourish. ^2025-12-24-000010 --- ### 3 Capitalism and the Real Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:10]]: > Capitalist realism is more like a pervasive atmosphere, conditioning not only the production of culture but also the regulation of work and education, and acting as a kind of invisible barrier constraining thought and ^2025-01-28-000005 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:13]]: > . Over the past thirty years, capitalist realism has successfully installed a ‘business ontology’ in which it is simply obvious that everything in society, including healthcare and education, should be run as a business. ^2025-01-28-000006 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:16]]: > For Lacan, the Real is what any ‘reality’ must suppress; indeed, reality constitutes itself through just this repression. The Real is an unrepresentable X, a traumatic void that can only be glimpsed in the fractures and inconsistencies in the field of apparent reality. So one strategy against capitalist realism could involve invoking the Real(s) underlying the reality that capitalism presents to us. ^2025-01-28-000007 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:20]]: > . The persistence of bureaucracy in late capitalism does not in itself indicate that capitalism does not work – rather, what it suggests is that the way in which capitalism does actually work is very different from the picture presented by capitalist realism. > > In ^2025-01-28-000008 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:20]]: > Environmental catastrophe is one such Real. But Green issues are already a contested zone, already a site where politicization is being fought for. In what follows, I want to stress two other aporias in capitalist realism, which are not yet politicized to anything like the same degree. The first is mental health. The other phenomenon I want to highlight is bureaucracy. ^2025-01-28-000009 --- ### 4 Reflexive Impotence, Immobilization and Liberal Communism Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:25]]: > While French students can still be found on the streets protesting against neoliberalism, British students, whose situation is incomparably worse, seem resigned to their fate. But this, I want to argue, is a matter not of apathy, nor of cynicism, but of reflexive impotence. They know things are bad, but more than that, they know they can’t do anything about it. ^2025-01-28-000011 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:27]]: > Many of the teenage students I encountered seemed to be in a state of what I would call depressive hedonia. Depression is usually characterized as a state of anhedonia, but the condition I’m referring to is constituted not by an inability to get pleasure so much as it by an inability to do anything else except pursue pleasure. There is a sense that ‘something is missing’ – but no appreciation that this mysterious, missing enjoyment can only be accessed beyond the pleasure principle. ^2025-01-28-000012 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:37]]: > Teachers are caught between being facilitator-entertainers and disciplinarian-authoritarians. Teachers want to help students to pass the exams; they want us to be authority figures who tell them what to do. Teachers being interpellated by students as authority figures exacerbates the ‘boredom’ problem, since isn’t anything that comes from the place of authority a priori boring? ^2025-01-28-000013 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:38]]: > Deleuze says that Control societies are based on debt rather than enclosure; but there is a way in which the current education system both indebts and encloses students. Pay for your own exploitation, the logic insists – get into debt so you can get the same McJob you could have walked into if you’d left school ^2025-01-28-000014 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:41]]: > Žižek is right to argue that, far from constituting any kind of progressive corrective to official capitalist ideology, liberal communism constitutes the dominant ideology of capitalism now. ‘Flexibility’, ‘nomadism’ and ‘spontaneity’ are the very hallmarks of management in a post-Fordist, Control society. ^2025-01-28-000015 --- Added on [[2025-01-28|2025-01-28 19:43]]: > Harvey demonstrates that, in an era popularly described as ‘post-political’, class war has continued to be fought, but only by one side: the wealthy. . The top 0.1 per cent of income earners in the US increased their share of the national income from 2 per cent in 1978 to over 6 per cent by 1999, while the ratio of the median compensation of workers to the salaries of CEOs increased from just over 30 to 1 in 1970 to nearly 500 to 1 by 2000.... As Harvey shows, neoliberals were more Leninist than the Leninists, using think-tanks as the intellectual vanguard to create the ideological climate in which capitalist realism could flourish. ^2025-01-28-000016 --- ### 5 October 6, 1979: ‘don’t Let Yourself Get Attached to Anything’ Added on [[2025-01-29|2025-01-29 18:37]]: > The situation of the family in post-Fordist capitalism is contradictory, in precisely the way that traditional Marxism expected: capitalism requires the family (as an essential means of reproducing and caring for labor power; as a salve for the psychic wounds inflicted by anarchic social-economic conditions), even as it undermines it (denying parents time with children, putting intolerable stress on couples as they become the exclusive source of affective consolation for each other ^2025-01-29-000001 --- Added on [[2025-01-30|2025-01-30 20:41]]: > In many ways, the left has never recovered from being wrong-footed by Capital’s mobilization and metabolization of the desire for emancipation from Fordist routine. it was easy for the advocates of post-Fordist Capital to present themselves as the opponents of the status quo, bravely resisting an inertial organized labor ‘pointlessly’ invested in fruitless ideological antagonism which served the ends of union leaders and politicians, but did little to advance the hopes of the class they purportedly represented. ^2025-01-30-000001 --- Added on [[2025-01-30|2025-01-30 20:44]]: > The psychological conflict raging within individuals cannot but have casualties. Marazzi is researching the link between the increase in bi-polar disorder and post-Fordism and, if, as Deleuze and Guattari argue, schizophrenia is the condition that marks the outer edges of capitalism, then bi-polar disorder is the mental illness proper to the ‘interior’ of capitalism. ^2025-01-30-000002 --- Added on [[2025-01-30|2025-01-30 20:48]]: > The current ruling ontology denies any possibility of a social causation of mental illness. The chemico-biologization of mental illness is of course strictly commensurate with its de-politicization. Considering mental illness an individual chemico-biological problem has enormous benefits for capitalism. First, it reinforces Capital’s drive towards atomistic individualization Second, it provides an enormously lucrative market in which multinational pharmaceutical companies can peddle their pharmaceuticals It goes without saying that all mental illnesses are neurologically instantiated, but this says nothing about their causation. ^2025-01-30-000003 --- ### 6 All That Is Solid Melts Into Pr: Market Stalinism and Bureaucratic Anti-production Added on [[2025-01-30|2025-01-30 20:56]]: > The supposed marketization of education, for instance, rests on a confused and underdeveloped analogy: are students the consumers of the service or its product? ^2025-01-30-000004 --- Added on [[2025-01-30|2025-01-30 20:57]]: > Inevitably, work becomes geared towards the generation and massaging of representations rather than to the official goals of the work itself. This reversal of priorities is one of the hallmarks of a system which can be characterized without hyperbole as ‘market Stalinism’. What late capitalism repeats from Stalinism is just this valuing of symbols of achievement over actual achievement. ^2025-01-30-000005 --- Added on [[2025-01-30|2025-01-30 20:59]]: > In a process that repeats itself with iron predictability everywhere that they are installed, targets quickly cease to be a way of measuring performance and become ends in themselves. ^2025-01-30-000007 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 14:34]]: > It would be a mistake to regard this market Stalinism as some deviation from the ‘true spirit’ of capitalism. On the contrary, it would be better to say that an essential dimension of Stalinism was inhibited by its association with a social project like socialism and can only emerge in a late capitalist culture in which images acquire an autonomous force. The way value is generated on the stock exchange depends of course less on what a company ‘really does’, and more on perceptions of, and beliefs about, its (future) performance. ^2025-01-31-000001 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 14:37]]: > Here, Žižek’s elaboration of Lacan’s concept of the ‘big Other’ is crucial. The big Other is the collective fiction, the symbolic structure, presupposed by any social field. The big Other can never be encountered in itself; instead, we only ever confront its stand-ins. These representatives are by no means always leaders. Indeed, the big Other could be defined as the consumer of PR and propaganda, the virtual figure which is required to believe even when no individual can. To use one of Žižek’s examples: who was it, for instance, who didn’t know that Really Existing Socialism (RES) was shabby and corrupt? Not any of the people, who were all too aware of its shortcomings; nor any of the government administrators, who couldn’t but know. No, it was the big Other who was the one deemed not to know – who wasn’t allowed to know – the quotidian reality of RES. ^2025-01-31-000002 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 14:38]]: > Postmodernism can be construed as the name for the complex of crises that the decline in the belief in the big Other has triggered, as Lyotard’s famous formulation of the postmodern condition – ‘incredulity towards metanarratives’ –suggests. ^2025-01-31-000003 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 14:46]]: > when a judge speaks, there is in a way more truth in his words (the words of the Institution of law) than in the direct reality of the person of judge if one limits oneself to what one sees, one simply misses the point. Lacan aims at this paradox with his ‘les non-dupes errent’: those who do not allow themselves to be caught in the symbolic deception/fiction, who continue to believe their eyes, are the ones who err most. ^2025-01-31-000004 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 14:48]]: > the abolition of the Symbolic led not to a direct encounter with the Real, but to a kind of hemorrhaging of the Real. For Baudrillard, phenomena such as fly on the wall documentaries and political opinion polls – both of which claimed to present reality in an unmediated way – would always pose an insoluble dilemma. Did the presence of the cameras affect the behavior of those being filmed? Would the publication of poll results affect the future behavior of voters? ^2025-01-31-000005 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 14:52]]: > Kafka’s purgatorial vision of a bureaucratic labyrinth without end chimes with Žižek’s claim that the Soviet system was an ‘empire of signs’, in which even the Nomenklatura themselves –including Stalin and Molotov – were engaged in interpreting a complex series of social semiotic signals. No-one knew what was required; instead, individuals could only guess what particular gestures or directives meant. ^2025-01-31-000006 --- ### 7 ‘...if You Can Watch the Overlap of One Reality With Another’: Capitalist Realism As Dreamwork and Memory Disorder Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:01]]: > we know from Kant, Nietzsche and psychoanalysis that waking, as much as dreaming, experience, depends upon just such screening narratives. If the Real is unbearable, any reality we construct must be a tissue of inconsistencies. What differentiates Kant, Nietzsche and Freud from the tiresome cliché that ‘life is but a dream’ is the sense that the confabulations we live are consensual. ^2025-01-31-000007 --- ### 8 ‘there’s No Central Exchange’ Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:12]]: > Conservative and Labor governments have discovered that when they give powers to private companies, and those private companies screw up, voters blame the government for giving the powers away, rather than the companies for misusing them ^2025-01-31-000008 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:16]]: > The call center experience distils the political phenomenology of late capitalism: the boredom and frustration punctuated by cheerily piped PR, the repeating of the same dreary details many times to different poorly trained and badly informed operatives, the building rage that must remain impotent because it can have no legitimate object, since – as is very quickly clear to the caller –there is no-one who knows, and no-one who could do anything even if they could. Anger can only be a matter of venting; it is aggression in a vacuum, directed at someone who is a fellow victim of the system but with whom there is no possibility of communality. Just as the anger has no proper object, it will have no effect. ^2025-01-31-000009 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:19]]: > The supreme genius of Kafka was to have explored the negative atheology proper to Capital: the centre is missing, but we cannot stop searching for it or positing it. It is not that there is nothing there – it is that what is there is not capable of exercising responsibility. ^2025-01-31-000010 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:21]]: > Instead of saying that everyone – i.e. every one – is responsible for climate change, we all have to do our bit, it would be better to say that no-one is, and that’s the very problem. The cause of eco-catastrophe is an impersonal structure which, even though it is capable of producing all manner of effects, is precisely not a subject capable of exercising responsibility. The required subject – a collective subject - does not exist, yet the crisis, like all the other global crises we’re now facing, demands that it be constructed. ^2025-01-31-000011 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:28]]: > . What agencies are capable of regulating and controlling impersonal structures? How is it possible to chastise a corporate structure? Yes, corporations can legally be treated as individuals – but the problem is that corporations, whilst certainly entities, are not like individual humans, and any analogy between punishing corporations and punishing individuals will therefore necessarily be poor. And it is not as if corporations are the deep-level agents behind everything; they are themselves constrained by/ expressions of the ultimate cause-that-is-not-a-subject: Capital. ^2025-01-31-000012 --- ### 9 Marxist Supernanny Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:29]]: > Nothing could be a clearer illustration of what Žižek has identified as the failure of the Father function, the crisis of the paternal superego in late capitalism, than a typical edition of Supernanny. The program offers what amounts to a relentless, ^2025-01-31-000013 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:30]]: > Supernanny is a Spinozist insofar as, like Spinoza, she takes it for granted that children are in a state of abjection. They are unable to recognize their own interests, unable to apprehend either the causes of their actions or their (usually deleterious) effects. But the problems that Supernanny confronts do not arise from the actions or character of the children – who can only be expected to be idiotic hedonists – but with the parents. It is the parents’ following of the trajectory of the pleasure principle, the path of least resistance, that causes most of the misery in the families. In a pattern that quickly becomes familiar, the parents’ pursuit of the easy life leads them to accede to their children’s every demand, which become increasingly tyrannical. > > Rather ^2025-01-31-000014 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:40]]: > The reason that focus groups and capitalist feedback systems fail, even when they generate commodities that are immensely popular, is that people do not know what they want. This is not only because people’s desire is already present but concealed from them (although this is often the case). Rather, the most powerful forms of desire are precisely cravings for the strange, the unexpected, the weird. These can only be supplied by artists and media professionals who are prepared to give people something different from that which already satisfies them; . Such innovations are unthinkable now that the public has been displaced by the consumer. ^2025-01-31-000015 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:42]]: > It’s well past time for the left to cease limiting its ambitions to the establishing of a big state. But being ‘at a distance from the state’ does not mean either abandoning the state or retreating into the private space It means recognizing that the goal of a genuinely new left should be not be to take over the state but to subordinate the state to the general will. ^2025-01-31-000016 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:44]]: > Despite initial appearances (and hopes), capitalist realism was not undermined by the credit crisis of 2008. The speculations that capitalism might be on the verge of collapsing soon proved to be unfounded. It quickly became clear that, far from constituting the end of capitalism, the bank bail-outs were a massive re-assertion of the capitalist realist insistence that there is no alternative. Nevertheless, what did happen in 2008 was the collapse of the framework which has provided ideological cover for capitalist accumulation since the 1970s. After the bank bail-outs neoliberalism has, in every sense, been discredited. ^2025-01-31-000017 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:46]]: > We can now see that, while neoliberalism was necessarily capitalist realist, capitalist realism need not be neoliberal. In order to save itself, capitalism could revert to a model of social democracy or to a Children of Men–like authoritarianism. Without a credible and coherent alternative to capitalism, capitalist realism will continue to rule the political-economic unconscious. > > But ^2025-01-31-000018 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:47]]: > The failure of previous forms of anti-capitalist political organization should not be a cause for despair, but what needs to be left behind is a certain romantic attachment to the politics of failure, to the comfortable position of a defeated marginality. ^2025-01-31-000019 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:49]]: > New forms of industrial action need to be instituted against managerialism. For instance, in the case of teachers and lecturers, the tactic of strikes (or even of marking bans) should be abandoned, because they only hurt students and members (at the college where I used to work, one-day strikes were pretty much welcomed by management because they saved on the wage bill whilst causing negligible disruption to the college). ^2025-01-31-000020 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:50]]: > We must convert widespread mental health problems from medicalized conditions into effective antagonisms. Affective disorders are forms of captured discontent; this disaffection can and must be channeled outwards, directed towards its real cause, Capital. Furthermore, the proliferation of certain kinds of mental illness in late capitalism makes the case for a new austerity, a case that is also made by the increasing urgency of dealing with environmental disaster. ^2025-01-31-000021 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:51]]: > If, as Oliver James, Žižek and Supernanny have shown, unlimited license leads to misery and disaffection, then limitations placed on desire are likely to quicken, rather than deaden, it. In any case, rationing of some sort is inevitable. The issue is whether it will be collectively managed, or whether it will be imposed by authoritarian means when it is already too late. ^2025-01-31-000022 --- Added on [[2025-01-31|2025-01-31 15:52]]: > The long, dark night of the end of history has to be grasped as an enormous opportunity. From a situation in which nothing can happen, suddenly anything is possible again. ^2025-01-31-000023 ---